IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience
Leading citation impact metric from Clarivate Journal Citation Reports
55 papers with at least that number of citations each
State Council for Professorship (HĐGSNN) Scoring
Quyết định số 26/QĐ-HĐGSNN ngày 11/7/2025 (Mục quốc tế)
HĐGSNN Score History
By article publication year| Year | Max Score | Evaluation Details | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.50đ | WoS Q1 có IF ≥ 3.0(IF: 4.2) | 🔵 Computed |
| 2025 | 2.50đ | WoS Q1 có IF ≥ 3.0(IF: 4.4) | 🔵 Computed |
| 2024 | 2.50đ | WoS Q1 có IF ≥ 3.0(IF: 3.7) | 🔵 Computed |
| 2023 | 2.50đ | WoS Q1 có IF ≥ 3.0(IF: 3.9) | 🔵 Computed |
| 2022 | 2.50đ | WoS Q1 có IF ≥ 3.0(IF: 3.206) | 🔵 Computed |
| 2021 | 2.00đ | WoS Q1(IF: 2.935) | 🔵 Computed |
| 2020 | 2.00đ | WoS Q1(IF: 2.791) | 🔵 Computed |
| 2019 | 2.00đ | WoS Q1(IF: 1.927) | 🔵 Computed |
| 2018 | 2.00đ | WoS Q1(IF: 2.158) | 🔵 Computed |
Note: Domestic journal scores are officially collected from annual HĐGSNN decisions across councils. International journal scores are dynamically computed according to Decision 26/QĐ-HĐGSNN based on quartile and citation metrics in the publication year.
Aims & Scope
The IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience reports on original, innovative and interdisciplinary work on all aspects of molecular systems, cellular systems, and tissues (including molecular electronics). Topics covered in the journal focus on a broad spectrum of aspects, both on foundations and on applications. Specifically, methods and techniques, experimental aspects, design and implementation, instrumentation and laboratory equipment, clinical aspects, hardware and software data acquisition and analysis and computer based modelling are covered (based on traditional or high performance computing - parallel computers or computer networks).
SCImago & Scopus Journal Intelligence
Global SCImago ranking, SJR prestige index, Scopus coverage, and societal policy impact
Weighted prestige citation metric per document indexed in the Scopus database.
Measures cumulative publication volume and citation impact.
Average citations received per document published in the 2-year window.
Estimated Article Processing Charge for Open Access publication.
Scopus 3-Year Publication & Citation Window
Aggregated from Scopus database across the 3-year SJR evaluation window.
Societal Impact & Inclusivity (SCImago)
Citations in government and international policy documents
Percentage of female authors published in the journal
Real-world societal policy reach and author gender diversity tracked by SCImago.
Scopus Subject Categories
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Classification
Major / minor zone classification and CAS Early Warning List history
Publishing & Editorial Information
Detailed publisher, peer-review turnaround, and publication cycle specifications
WoS Categories & Quartiles
Detailed JCR / JCI category rankings and quartile breakdown from Clarivate
| Category | Index | Rank | Quartile |
|---|---|---|---|
BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS | JCRSCIE | 21/85 | Q1 |
NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY | JCRSCIE | 82/148 | Q3 |
BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS | JCISCIE | 21/85 | Q1 |
NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY | JCISCIE | 42/148 | Q2 |
Annual Historical Statistics & Publications
Track annual publication volume, total citations, and Impact Factor evolution
| Year | Impact Factor | Articles / Year | Total Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | — | 50 | 13 |
| 2025 | 4.4 | 72 | 136 |
| 2024 | 3.7 | 74 | 475 |
| 2023 | 3.9 | 81 | 875 |
| 2022 | 3.206 | 97 | 1,445 |
| 2021 | 2.935 | 120 | 2,074 |
| 2020 | 2.791 | 80 | 1,265 |
| 2019 | 1.927 | 116 | 1,908 |
| 2018 | 2.158 | 94 | 2,244 |
| 2017 | — | 143 | 2,713 |
| 2016 | — | 177 | 2,528 |
| 2015 | — | 157 | 2,850 |
Journal Metrics & Citation Visualizations
Impact Factor Trend (2018–2024)
Clarivate IF trend for IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience
Total Cites vs Self-Cites
Evaluation of scholarly independence and citation reach
Citations per Document
Citation metric windows across 2, 3, and 4 years
Similar Journals in Discipline
Journals in the same research field with comparable impact metrics